aura writes; Evidence continues to mount indicating that Barack Obama was ‘diebold’ by Hillary Clinton yesterday in New Hampshire, which was the real reason she won the primary in a monumental turnaround. Remember the old saying, ‘If something looks too good to be true, it probably is’? Evidence has emerged that Clinton’s victory yesterday was due to vote fraud
Paul and Obama cheated out of 3rd and 1st by voting machines, hand count fraud
<em ?Paul Joseph Watson
Wednesday, January 9, 2008
There were several major vote fraud issues to arise out of the New Hampshire primary revolving mainly around Ron Paul and Barack Obama, who were both seemingly cheated out of third and first places respectively as a result of rigged Diebold voting machines and deliberate malfeasance in the counting of hand-written paper ballots.
– Obama had a 13 to 15 point lead over Hillary Clinton heading into the primary. Nothing occured that boosted Hillary’s numbers immediately before the election, in fact immediately after the staged crying incident, many pundits argued it could only have harmed her chances. And yet Hillary somehow managed to instigate a near 20 point swing to defeat Obama by three per cent. If not for her 7% swing as a result of Diebold voting machines, Hillary would have lost to Obama. If Obama was struggling he would probably contest this bizarre outcome, but he is likely to accept the results simply to save face. Read rest at LINK